Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved
Full Text
Any party to a suit or other proceeding may show that any judgment, order or decree which is relevant under section 34, 35 or 36, and which has been proved by the adverse party, was delivered by a Court not competent to deliver it, or was obtained by fraud or collusion.
Plain English Summary
Parties can challenge the validity of relevant prior judgments by proving they were obtained through fraud, collusion, or by an incompetent court.
Key Legal Elements
- Judgment must be relevant under Sections 34-36
- Judgment must have been proved by adverse party
- Grounds: Incompetency of Court
- Grounds: Fraud or Collusion
Practical Note
This provision allows a party to impeach a judgment produced against them by demonstrating fundamental jurisdictional or ethical flaws.
हिंदी पाठ
किसी वाद या अन्य कार्यवाही का कोई भी पक्षकार यह दर्शित कर सकेगा कि कोई निर्णय, आदेश या डिक्री, जो धारा 34, 35 या 36 के अधीन सुसंगत है और जो विरोधी पक्षकार द्वारा साबित की गई है, ऐसे न्यायालय द्वारा दी गई थी जो उसे देने के लिए सक्षम नहीं था, अथवा वह कपट या मिलीभगत द्वारा प्राप्त की गई थी।